| Title |
Pharmacological versus microvascular decompression approaches for the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia: clinical outcomes and direct costs
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Pain Research, August 2011
|
| DOI | 10.2147/jpr.s20555 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Laurinda Lemos, Carlos Alegria, Joana Oliveira, Ana Machado, Pedro Oliveira, Armando Almeida |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Hong Kong | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 49 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 10% |
| Other | 10 | 19% |
| Unknown | 9 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 44% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 6% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 6% |
| Psychology | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 13% |
| Unknown | 10 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2019.
All research outputs
#7,656,930
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pain Research
#773
of 1,787 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,799
of 120,930 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pain Research
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,787 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,930 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.