↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Methodological choices for the clinical development of medical devices

Overview of attention for article published in Medical Devices : Evidence and Research, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
Title
Methodological choices for the clinical development of medical devices
Published in
Medical Devices : Evidence and Research, September 2014
DOI 10.2147/mder.s63869
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alain Bernard, Michel Vaneau, Isabelle Fournel, Hubert Galmiche, Patrice Nony, Jean Michel Dubernard

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 78 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 18%
Student > Master 11 14%
Researcher 10 13%
Other 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Other 15 19%
Unknown 16 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 29%
Engineering 7 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Neuroscience 3 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 4%
Other 18 23%
Unknown 20 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2022.
All research outputs
#8,571,053
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Medical Devices : Evidence and Research
#124
of 314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,253
of 248,750 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Devices : Evidence and Research
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 248,750 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.