↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

A budget impact analysis of Spiromax® compared with Turbuhaler® for the treatment of moderate to severe asthma: a potential improvement in the inhalation technique to strengthen medication adherence…

Overview of attention for article published in ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
Title
A budget impact analysis of Spiromax® compared with Turbuhaler® for the treatment of moderate to severe asthma: a potential improvement in the inhalation technique to strengthen medication adherence could represent savings for the Spanish Healthcare System and five Spanish regions
Published in
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR, September 2016
DOI 10.2147/ceor.s111453
Pubmed ID
Authors

Josep Darbà, Gabriela Ramírez, Juan L García-Rivero, Sagrario Mayoralas-Alises, José Francisco Pascual, Albert Roger, Diego Vargas, Adi Bijedic

Abstract

To assess the economic impact of the introduction of DuoResp(®) Spiromax(®) by focusing on a potential improvement in the inhalation technique to strengthen medication adherence for the treatment of moderate to severe asthmatics in Spain and five Spanish regions including Andalusia, Catalonia, Galicia, Madrid, and Valencia. A 4-year budget impact model was developed for the period 2015-2018 from the Spanish Healthcare System perspective. Budesonide-formoterol fixed-dose combination delivered by Turbuhaler(®) was considered to be the most appropriate comparator for assessing the budget impact with the introduction of DuoResp(®) Spiromax(®). National and regional data on asthma prevalence were obtained from the literature. Input parameters on health care resources were obtained by consulting experts from different Spanish hospitals. Resources used included medical visits, emergency room visits, and hospitalizations. The average numbers of primary care and specialist visits per year were also gathered. Based on health care resource use per patient, the total treatment cost per patient was estimated. The population with moderate to severe asthma treated with budesonide-formoterol fixed-dose combinations delivered by Turbuhaler(®) in 2015 was estimated to be 166,985 in Spain. Region-specific prevalence data resulted in 25,081, 12,392, 16,097, 17,829, and 15,148 patients in Andalusia, Catalonia, Galicia, Madrid, and Valencia, respectively. Based on the forecast uptake of DuoResp(®) Spiromax(®), the total budget savings in Spain were expected to be €1.509 million over the next 4 years. Region-specific rates imply that the total savings were expected to be €229,706 in Andalusia, €90,145 in Catalonia, €188,327 in Galicia, €122,669 in Madrid, and €165,796 in Valencia over 2015-2018. The introduction of DuoResp(®) Spiromax(®), which represents a potential improvement in the inhalation technique to strengthen medication adherence for the treatment of moderate to severe asthma, could represent savings for the Spanish National Health Society and five Spanish regions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 19%
Other 4 13%
Researcher 4 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Professor 3 10%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 7 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 19%
Psychology 3 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 6%
Other 6 19%
Unknown 9 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2018.
All research outputs
#7,525,084
of 25,838,141 outputs
Outputs from ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR
#153
of 527 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,439
of 349,850 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR
#9
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,838,141 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 527 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,850 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.