↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

The role of inflammation and antiinflammation therapies in keratoconjunctivitis sicca

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Ophthalmology, October 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
Title
The role of inflammation and antiinflammation therapies in keratoconjunctivitis sicca
Published in
Clinical Ophthalmology, October 2008
DOI 10.2147/opth.s3023
Pubmed ID
Authors

Koray Gumus, Dwight H Cavanagh

Abstract

To review and integrate recent advances in identifying the role of inflammation in the pathogenesis of dry eye conditions and the biological rationale and practical clinical aspects of newer, antiinflammatory theories. A comprehensive literature survey. Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca (KCS) is a multifactorial and complex disorder in which ocular surface inflammations play a central role. Identification of specific CD4-T-Cell pathways and the recent recognition of targeting of alpha-fodrin suggest a case for novel new therapeutic aspects such as anti-CD4 monoclonal antibodies, systemic linoleic and gamma-linolenic acids, and omega-6 essential fatty acids. Replacement of tear volume with nonpreserved wetting agents and standard typical antiinflammatory corticosteroid and/or cyclosporine A continues to be central current conventional therapy for KCS.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 13%
Student > Master 6 13%
Student > Bachelor 5 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Other 14 31%
Unknown 5 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 47%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 20%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Chemistry 2 4%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 6 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2023.
All research outputs
#5,446,629
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#491
of 3,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,051
of 101,351 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#3
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,712 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 101,351 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.