↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Delayed Bleeding After Endoscopic Resection of Colorectal Polyps: Identifying High-Risk Patients

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology, December 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#18 of 341)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
50 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
Delayed Bleeding After Endoscopic Resection of Colorectal Polyps: Identifying High-Risk Patients
Published in
Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology, December 2021
DOI 10.2147/ceg.s282699
Pubmed ID
Authors

Oliver Bendall, Joel James, Katarzyna M Pawlak, Sauid Ishaq, J Andy Tau, Noriko Suzuki, Steven Bollipo, Keith Siau

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 50 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 16%
Librarian 1 5%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Researcher 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 9 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 21%
Unknown 10 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2024.
All research outputs
#1,440,422
of 26,563,746 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology
#18
of 341 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,165
of 531,218 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,563,746 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 341 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 531,218 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them