| Title |
The POCUS Consult: How Point of Care Ultrasound Helps Guide Medical Decision Making
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of General Medicine, December 2021
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ijgm.s339476 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jake A Rice, Jonathan Brewer, Tyler Speaks, Christopher Choi, Peiman Lahsaei, Bryan T Romito |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 13% |
| Spain | 2 | 6% |
| Malaysia | 2 | 6% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| Peru | 1 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| Belgium | 1 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 14 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 65% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 26% |
| Scientists | 2 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 72 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 17% |
| Unknown | 34 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 44% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 1% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 1% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 1% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 36 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2022.
All research outputs
#2,314,826
of 25,365,817 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of General Medicine
#124
of 1,639 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,154
of 518,305 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of General Medicine
#8
of 187 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,365,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,639 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 518,305 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 187 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.