↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Improving self-regulation in adolescents: current evidence for the role of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy

Overview of attention for article published in Adolescent Health, Medicine and Therapeutics, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#23 of 151)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
11 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
223 Mendeley
Title
Improving self-regulation in adolescents: current evidence for the role of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy
Published in
Adolescent Health, Medicine and Therapeutics, September 2016
DOI 10.2147/ahmt.s65820
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carisa Perry-Parrish, Nikeea Copeland-Linder, Lindsey Webb, Ashley H Shields, Erica MS Sibinga

Abstract

Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) was introduced in 1995 to address the problem of recurrent depression. MBCT is based on the notion that meditation helps individuals effectively deploy and regulate attention to effectively manage and treat a range of psychological symptoms, including emotional responses to stress, anxiety, and depression. Several studies demonstrate that mindfulness approaches can effectively reduce negative emotional reactions that result from and/or exacerbate psychiatric difficulties and exposure to stressors among children, adolescents, and their parents. Mindfulness may be particularly relevant for youth with maladaptive cognitive processes such as rumination. Clinical experience regarding the utility of mindfulness-based approaches, including MBCT, is being increasingly supported by empirical studies to optimize the effective treatment of youth with a range of challenging symptoms. This paper provides a description of MBCT, including mindfulness practices, theoretical mechanisms of action, and targeted review of studies in adolescents.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 223 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 223 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 46 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 13%
Student > Bachelor 28 13%
Student > Postgraduate 13 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 5%
Other 32 14%
Unknown 64 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 83 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 6%
Social Sciences 13 6%
Neuroscience 8 4%
Other 17 8%
Unknown 74 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2019.
All research outputs
#1,556,561
of 25,604,262 outputs
Outputs from Adolescent Health, Medicine and Therapeutics
#23
of 151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,475
of 348,993 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Adolescent Health, Medicine and Therapeutics
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,604,262 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 151 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,993 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them