↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Growth hormone and aging: A challenging controversy

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Interventions in Aging, December 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
7 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
79 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
Title
Growth hormone and aging: A challenging controversy
Published in
Clinical Interventions in Aging, December 2008
DOI 10.2147/cia.s3697
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrzej Bartke

Abstract

Although advanced age or symptoms of aging are not among approved indications for growth hormone (GH) therapy, recombinant human GH (rhGH) and various GH-related products are aggressively promoted as anti-aging therapies. Well-controlled studies of the effects of rhGH treatment in endocrinologically normal elderly subjects report some improvements in body composition and a number of undesirable side effects in sharp contrast to major benefits of GH therapy in patients with GH deficiency. Controversies surrounding the potential utility of GH in treatment of a geriatric patient are fueled by increasing evidence linking GH and cancer and by remarkably increased lifespan of GH-resistant and GH-deficient mice. Conservation of cellular signaling mechanisms that influence aging in organisms ranging from worms to mammals suggests that at least some of the results obtained in mutant mice are applicable to the human. We suggest that the normal, physiological functions of GH in promoting growth, sexual maturation and fecundity involve significant costs in terms of aging and life expectancy. Natural decline in GH levels during aging likely contributes to concomitant alterations in body composition and vigor but also may be offering important protection from cancer and other age-associated diseases.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Unknown 101 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 19%
Student > Bachelor 16 15%
Student > Master 15 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 7%
Other 19 18%
Unknown 15 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 22 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 17%
Neuroscience 6 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 2%
Other 14 13%
Unknown 19 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2023.
All research outputs
#1,835,473
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#197
of 1,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,398
of 179,590 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#3
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,968 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,590 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.