↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

IDH1 and IDH2 mutations as novel therapeutic targets: current perspectives

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Blood Medicine, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
176 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
262 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
IDH1 and IDH2 mutations as novel therapeutic targets: current perspectives
Published in
Journal of Blood Medicine, September 2016
DOI 10.2147/jbm.s70716
Pubmed ID
Authors

Johanna Mondesir, Christophe Willekens, Mehdi Touat, Stéphane de Botton

Abstract

Isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 and 2 (IDH1 and IDH2) are key metabolic enzymes that convert isocitrate to α-ketoglutarate. IDH1/2 mutations define distinct subsets of cancers, including low-grade gliomas and secondary glioblastomas, chondrosarcomas, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas, and hematologic malignancies. Somatic point mutations in IDH1/2 confer a gain-of-function in cancer cells, resulting in the accumulation and secretion in vast excess of an oncometabolite, the D-2-hydroxyglutarate (D-2HG). Overproduction of D-2HG interferes with cellular metabolism and epigenetic regulation, contributing to oncogenesis. Indeed, high levels of D-2HG inhibit α-ketoglutarate-dependent dioxygenases, including histone and DNA demethylases, leading to histone and DNA hypermethylation and finally a block in cell differentiation. Furthermore, D-2HG is a biomarker suitable for the detection of IDH1/2 mutations at diagnosis and predictive of the clinical response. Finally, mutant-IDH1/2 enzymes inhibitors have entered clinical trials for patients with IDH1/2 mutations and represent a novel drug class for targeted therapy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 262 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 261 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 14%
Researcher 32 12%
Student > Master 31 12%
Student > Bachelor 30 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 8%
Other 42 16%
Unknown 71 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 64 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 48 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 10%
Chemistry 13 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 3%
Other 23 9%
Unknown 79 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2021.
All research outputs
#6,118,763
of 22,699,621 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Blood Medicine
#68
of 286 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,519
of 336,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Blood Medicine
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,699,621 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 286 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,978 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.