↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Aspergillus fumigatus in the cystic fibrosis lung: pros and cons of azole therapy

Overview of attention for article published in Infection and Drug Resistance, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
Title
Aspergillus fumigatus in the cystic fibrosis lung: pros and cons of azole therapy
Published in
Infection and Drug Resistance, September 2016
DOI 10.2147/idr.s63621
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pierre-Régis Burgel, André Paugam, Dominique Hubert, Clémence Martin

Abstract

Aspergillus fumigatus is the main fungus cultured in the airways of patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis occurs in ~10% of CF patients and is clearly associated with airway damage and lung function decline. The effects of A. fumigatus colonization in the absence of allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis are less well established. Retrospective clinical studies found associations of A. fumigatus-positive cultures with computed tomography scan abnormalities, greater risk of CF exacerbations and hospitalizations, and/or lung function decline. These findings were somewhat variable among studies and provided only circumstantial evidence for a role of A. fumigatus colonization in CF lung disease progression. The availability of a growing number of oral antifungal triazole drugs, together with the results of nonrandomized case series suggesting positive effects of azole therapies, makes it tempting to treat CF patients with these antifungal drugs. However, the only randomized controlled trial that has used itraconazole in CF patients showed no significant benefit. Because triazoles may have significant adverse effects and drug interactions, and because their prolonged use has been associated with the emergence of azole-resistant A. fumigatus isolates, it remains unclear whether or not CF patients benefit from azole therapy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 82 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 17%
Student > Master 12 15%
Student > Bachelor 9 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 11%
Other 7 9%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 21 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 15%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Engineering 3 4%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 22 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2016.
All research outputs
#18,472,072
of 22,889,074 outputs
Outputs from Infection and Drug Resistance
#1,034
of 1,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#258,245
of 337,404 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Infection and Drug Resistance
#6
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,889,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,660 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,404 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.