↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Oral anticoagulation to reduce risk of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation: current and future therapies

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Interventions in Aging, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
Title
Oral anticoagulation to reduce risk of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation: current and future therapies
Published in
Clinical Interventions in Aging, January 2013
DOI 10.2147/cia.s37818
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alpesh Amin

Abstract

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with an increased incidence and severity of strokes. The burden of AF-related stroke is expected to increase in parallel with the aging of the population. Oral anticoagulation with warfarin has been the pharmacologic standard for stroke risk reduction in patients with AF. When used with close attention to dosing and monitoring, warfarin is effective prophylactic therapy against thromboembolic stroke. However, it is underused by physicians, in part because of the known risks of adverse events with warfarin. Consequently, many patients with AF live with an avoidably elevated risk of stroke. New options, ie, oral anticoagulants with novel mechanisms of action, have recently been approved to reduce the risk of stroke in AF, and others are in development. These newer agents may address some of the complexities of warfarin use while providing similar or better efficacy and safety.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Germany 1 1%
Slovenia 1 1%
Unknown 93 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 15 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 11%
Researcher 10 10%
Student > Master 10 10%
Other 21 22%
Unknown 19 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 38%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 9%
Social Sciences 5 5%
Psychology 3 3%
Unspecified 3 3%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 25 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2023.
All research outputs
#3,622,393
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#407
of 1,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,466
of 289,007 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#7
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,968 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,007 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.