| Title |
Tadalafil in the treatment of erectile dysfunction
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, December 2008
|
| DOI | 10.2147/tcrm.s3336 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Robert M Coward, Culley C Carson |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 112 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 20 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 13% |
| Unknown | 41 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 21% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 16 | 14% |
| Chemistry | 14 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 9% |
| Unknown | 40 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,120,379
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#43
of 1,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,901
of 179,594 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#2
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,323 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,594 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.