| Title |
Estimating the willingness to pay for a quality-adjusted life year in Thailand: does the context of health gain matter?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ceor.s38062 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Montarat Thavorncharoensap, Yot Teerawattananon, Sirin Natanant, Wantanee Kulpeng, Jomkwan Yothasamut, Pitsaphun Werayingyong |
| Abstract |
This study aims to elicit the value of the willingness to pay (WTP) for a quality-adjusted life year (QALY) and to examine the factors associated with the WTP for a QALY (WTP/QALY) value under the Thai health care setting. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 84 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 14 | 17% |
| Researcher | 11 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 11% |
| Lecturer | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 10% |
| Other | 13 | 15% |
| Unknown | 21 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 21% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 9 | 11% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 16 | 19% |
| Unknown | 26 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2018.
All research outputs
#4,857,628
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR
#104
of 525 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,214
of 289,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 525 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,379 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.