↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Estimating the willingness to pay for a quality-adjusted life year in Thailand: does the context of health gain matter?

Overview of attention for article published in ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
Title
Estimating the willingness to pay for a quality-adjusted life year in Thailand: does the context of health gain matter?
Published in
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR, January 2013
DOI 10.2147/ceor.s38062
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thavorncharoensap, Teerawattananon, Sirin Natanant, Kulpeng, Yothasamut, Pitsaphun Werayingyoung

Abstract

This study aims to elicit the value of the willingness to pay (WTP) for a quality-adjusted life year (QALY) and to examine the factors associated with the WTP for a QALY (WTP/QALY) value under the Thai health care setting.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 71 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 20%
Researcher 10 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 11%
Lecturer 7 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 10%
Other 12 17%
Unknown 13 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 24%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 7 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Social Sciences 4 6%
Other 16 23%
Unknown 16 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2018.
All research outputs
#4,151,589
of 22,694,633 outputs
Outputs from ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR
#94
of 488 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,295
of 280,671 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,694,633 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 488 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,671 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.