↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Hydrophobic bile acids, genomic instability, Darwinian selection, and colon carcinogenesis

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology, December 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
111 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
Title
Hydrophobic bile acids, genomic instability, Darwinian selection, and colon carcinogenesis
Published in
Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology, December 2008
DOI 10.2147/ceg.s4343
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claire M Payne, Carol Bernstein, Katerina Dvorak, Harris Bernstein

Abstract

Sporadic colon cancer is caused predominantly by dietary factors. We have selected bile acids as a focus of this review since high levels of hydrophobic bile acids accompany a Western-style diet, and play a key role in colon carcinogenesis. We describe how bile acid-induced stresses cause cell death in susceptible cells, contribute to genomic instability in surviving cells, impose Darwinian selection on survivors and enhance initiation and progression to colon cancer. The most likely major mechanisms by which hydrophobic bile acids induce stresses on cells (DNA damage, endoplasmic reticulum stress, mitochondrial damage) are described. Persistent exposure of colon epithelial cells to hydrophobic bile acids can result in the activation of pro-survival stress-response pathways, and the modulation of numerous genes/proteins associated with chromosome maintenance and mitosis. The multiple mechanisms by which hydrophobic bile acids contribute to genomic instability are discussed, and include oxidative DNA damage, p53 and other mutations, micronuclei formation and aneuploidy. Since bile acids and oxidative stress decrease DNA repair proteins, an increase in DNA damage and increased genomic instability through this mechanism is also described. This review provides a mechanistic explanation for the important link between a Western-style diet and associated increased levels of colon cancer.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 75 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 28%
Student > Bachelor 11 14%
Researcher 9 12%
Student > Postgraduate 4 5%
Other 3 4%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 18 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 13%
Chemistry 6 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 5%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 18 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2018.
All research outputs
#6,387,185
of 22,694,633 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology
#90
of 306 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,240
of 165,682 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,694,633 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 306 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,682 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.