| Title |
Effectiveness and safety of citicoline in mild vascular cognitive impairment: the IDEALE study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Interventions in Aging, February 2013
|
| DOI | 10.2147/cia.s38420 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Antonino Maria Cotroneo, Alberto Castagna, Salvatore Putignano, Roberto Lacava, Fausto Fantò, Francesco Monteleone, Filomena Rocca, Alba Malara, Pietro Gareri |
| Abstract |
The studio di intervento nel decadimento vascolare lieve (IDEALE study) was an open multicenter Italian study, the aim of which was to assess the effectiveness and safety of oral citicoline in elderly people with mild vascular cognitive impairment. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 25% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 13% |
| Canada | 1 | 13% |
| Spain | 1 | 13% |
| Philippines | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 4 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 206 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 203 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 34 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 12% |
| Researcher | 23 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 6% |
| Other | 43 | 21% |
| Unknown | 46 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 48 | 23% |
| Psychology | 29 | 14% |
| Neuroscience | 16 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 37 | 18% |
| Unknown | 50 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2022.
All research outputs
#3,750,998
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#411
of 1,962 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,105
of 292,111 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#6
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,962 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,111 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.