↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Epilepsy during pregnancy: focus on management strategies

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Women's Health, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
113 Mendeley
Title
Epilepsy during pregnancy: focus on management strategies
Published in
International Journal of Women's Health, September 2016
DOI 10.2147/ijwh.s98973
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laura M Borgelt, Felecia M Hart, Jacquelyn L Bainbridge

Abstract

In the US, more than one million women with epilepsy are of childbearing age and have over 20,000 babies each year. Patients with epilepsy who become pregnant are at risk of complications, including changes in seizure frequency, maternal morbidity and mortality, and congenital anomalies due to antiepileptic drug exposure. Appropriate management of epilepsy during pregnancy may involve frequent monitoring of antiepileptic drug serum concentrations, potential preconception switching of antiepileptic medications, making dose adjustments, minimizing peak drug concentration with more frequent dosing, and avoiding potentially teratogenic medications. Ideally, preconception planning will be done to minimize risks to both the mother and fetus during pregnancy. It is important to recognize benefits and risks of current and emerging therapies, especially with revised pregnancy labeling in prescription drug product information. This review will outline risks for epilepsy during pregnancy, review various recommendations from leading organizations, and provide an evidence-based approach for managing patients with epilepsy before, during, and after pregnancy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 113 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 19 17%
Student > Postgraduate 12 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 8%
Researcher 8 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Other 19 17%
Unknown 38 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 35%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 12 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Neuroscience 3 3%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 44 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2018.
All research outputs
#5,560,777
of 22,889,074 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Women's Health
#224
of 773 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,842
of 337,404 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Women's Health
#6
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,889,074 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 773 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,404 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.