↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Risk factors for nosocomial nontraumatic coma: sepsis and respiratory failure

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
Risk factors for nosocomial nontraumatic coma: sepsis and respiratory failure
Published in
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, September 2016
DOI 10.2147/jmdh.s113682
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dao-Ming Tong, Ye-Ting Zhou, Shao-Dan Wang, Guang-Sheng Wang, Xiao-Dong Chen

Abstract

Coma's are a major cause of clinical deterioration or death. Identification of risks that predispose to coma are important in managing patients; however, the risk factors for nosocomial nontraumatic coma (NNC) are not well known. Our aim was to investigate the risk factors in patients with NNC. A retrospective case-control design was used to compare patients with NNC and a control group of patients without coma in a population-based cohort of 263 participants from the neurological intensive care unit in Shuyang County People's Hospital of Northern China. Coma was diagnosed by a Glasgow Coma Scale score ≤8. Adjusted odds ratios for patients with NNC were derived from multivariate logistic regression analyses. A total of 96 subjects had NNC. The prevalence of NNC was 36.5% among the subjects. Among these, 82% had acute cerebrovascular etiology. Most of the NNC usually occurred at day 3 after admission to the neurological intensive care unit. Patients with NNC had higher hospital mortality rates (67.7% vs 3%, P<0.0001) and were more likely to have a central herniation (47.9% vs 0%, P<0.001) or uncal herniation (11.5% vs 0%, P<0.001) than those without NNC. Multiple logistic regression showed that systemic inflammatory response syndrome-positive sepsis (odds ratio =4, 95% confidence interval =1.875-8.567, P<0.001) and acute respiratory failure (odds ratio =3.275, 95% confidence interval =1.014-10.573, P<0.05) were the factors independently associated with a higher risk of NNC. Systemic inflammatory response syndrome-positive sepsis and acute respiratory failure are independently associated with an increased risk of NNC. This information may be important for patients with NNC.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 4 24%
Student > Postgraduate 3 18%
Student > Bachelor 2 12%
Researcher 1 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 47%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Unknown 5 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2016.
All research outputs
#18,472,072
of 22,889,074 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
#634
of 823 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#258,241
of 337,404 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
#22
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,889,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 823 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,404 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.