| Title |
Psychiatrists’ awareness of adherence to antipsychotic medication in patients with schizophrenia: results from a survey conducted across Europe, the Middle East, and Africa
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Patient preference and adherence, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ppa.s37534 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
José Manuel Olivares, Köksal Alptekin, Jean-Michel Azorin, Fernando Cañas, Vincent Dubois, Robin Emsley, Philip Gorwood, Peter M Haddad, Dieter Naber, George Papageorgiou, Miquel Roca, Pierre Thomas, Guadalupe Martinez, Andreas Schreiner |
| Abstract |
Nonadherence is common among patients with schizophrenia, although the rates vary according to means of assessment and patient population. Failure to adhere to medication can have a major impact on the course of illness and treatment outcomes, including increasing the risk of relapse and rehospitalization. Understanding psychiatrists' perception of the causes and consequences of nonadherence is crucial to addressing adherence problems effectively. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nigeria | 1 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 92 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 16% |
| Other | 14 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 9% |
| Other | 16 | 17% |
| Unknown | 16 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 33% |
| Psychology | 15 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 6% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 9% |
| Unknown | 21 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2013.
All research outputs
#15,169,543
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#809
of 1,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#171,624
of 289,004 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#6
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,757 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,004 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.