| Title |
A Comparative, Three-Arm, Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Effectiveness and Tolerability of Bilastine vs Fexofenadine vs Levocetirizine at the Standard Dose and Bilastine vs Fexofenadine at Higher Than the Standard Dose (Up-Dosing) vs Levocetirizine and Hydroxyzine (in Combination) in Patients with Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology, February 2022
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ccid.s350122 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bela Shah, Dhiraj Dhoot, Ankita Choudhary, Neha Jangid, Deval Mistry, Shikha Shah, Shruti Kamat, Hanmant Barkate |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 54 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 12 | 22% |
| China | 1 | 2% |
| Argentina | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 40 | 74% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 53 | 98% |
| Scientists | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 22 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 9% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 5% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 16 | 73% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 17 | 77% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,148,171
of 26,170,906 outputs
Outputs from Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology
#98
of 934 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,949
of 532,105 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology
#2
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,170,906 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 934 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 532,105 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.