| Title |
Psychotropic Drug Use in Acute Myeloid Leukaemia (AML) and Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS): A Danish Nationwide Matched Cohort Study of 2404 AML and 1307 MDS Patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Epidemiology, February 2022
|
| DOI | 10.2147/clep.s336115 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Oda Jensen, Andreas Kiesbye Øvlisen, Lasse Hjort Jakobsen, Anne Stidsholt Roug, René Ernst Nielsen, Claus Werenberg Marcher, Lene Hyldahl Ebbesen, Kim Theilgaard-Mönch, Peter Møller, Claudia Schöllkopf, Christian Torp-Pedersen, Tarec Christoffer El-Galaly, Marianne Tang Severinsen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 20% |
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| Japan | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 12 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 17% |
| Researcher | 2 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 17% |
| Other | 1 | 8% |
| Librarian | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 4 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 25% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 8% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2022.
All research outputs
#8,618,954
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Epidemiology
#326
of 780 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#186,364
of 519,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Epidemiology
#10
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 780 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 519,499 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.