↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

miR-500a-3p is a Potential Prognostic Biomarker in Hepatocellular Carcinoma [Corrigendum]

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of General Medicine, February 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
Title
miR-500a-3p is a Potential Prognostic Biomarker in Hepatocellular Carcinoma [Corrigendum]
Published in
International Journal of General Medicine, February 2022
DOI 10.2147/ijgm.s364004
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jianting Long, Baoxian Liu, Zhijia Yao, Huiwen Weng, Heping Li, Chunlin Jiang, Shi Fang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2022.
All research outputs
#13,685,607
of 23,221,875 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of General Medicine
#446
of 1,481 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#215,954
of 507,813 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of General Medicine
#36
of 158 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,221,875 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,481 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 507,813 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 158 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.