Title |
Bevacizumab inhibits proliferation of choroidal endothelial cells by regulation of the cell cycle
|
---|---|
Published in |
Clinical Ophthalmology, February 2013
|
DOI | 10.2147/opth.s41556 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Raluca Rusovici, Chirag J Patel, Kakarla V Chalam |
Abstract |
The purpose of this study was to evaluate cell cycle changes in choroidal endothelial cells treated with varying doses of bevacizumab in the presence of a range of concentrations of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Bevacizumab, a drug widely used in the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration, choroidal neovascularization, and proliferative diabetic retinopathy, neutralizes all isoforms of VEGF. However, the effect of intravitreal administration of bevacizumab on the choroidal endothelial cell cycle has not been established. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 4 | 24% |
Researcher | 4 | 24% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 12% |
Professor | 1 | 6% |
Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
Other | 2 | 12% |
Unknown | 3 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 29% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 18% |
Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 6% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 6% |
Other | 2 | 12% |
Unknown | 4 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2013.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#820
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,184
of 291,228 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#10
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,228 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.