↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Spotlight on empagliflozin/metformin fixed-dose combination for the treatment of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Patient preference and adherence, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
Title
Spotlight on empagliflozin/metformin fixed-dose combination for the treatment of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review
Published in
Patient preference and adherence, September 2016
DOI 10.2147/ppa.s85748
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rohit Kedia, Supriya Kulkarni, Meredith Ross, Vijay Shivaswamy

Abstract

The dramatic rise in the prevalence of obesity and diabetes is associated with increased morbidity, mortality, and public health care costs worldwide. The need for new, effective, and long-lasting drugs is urgent. Recent research has focused on the role of the inhibitors of sodium- glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT-2). Clinical trials have shown that SGLT-2 inhibitors have glycemic efficacy and weight-lowering potential. Dual drug therapy is a recommended therapy for patients with new-onset type 2 diabetes who need significant glycemic control. Fixed-dose combination therapy represents a particularly attractive option as it may reduce pill burden and improve adherence. The combination of metformin and empagliflozin was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in 2014 and represents a safe and effective means to combat glycemic control and weight gain. The purpose of this systematic review is to summarize the background of the SGLT-2 inhibitors, particularly empagliflozin, and focus on the safety and efficacy of the fixed-dose combination of empagliflozin and metformin.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 86 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 10%
Student > Bachelor 9 10%
Other 7 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Other 15 17%
Unknown 20 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 37%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 12 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 3%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 20 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2016.
All research outputs
#18,473,108
of 22,890,496 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#1,300
of 1,606 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#258,241
of 337,406 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#69
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,890,496 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,606 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,406 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.