| Title |
Prescribing practice and evaluation of appropriateness of enteral nutrition in a university teaching hospital
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, February 2013
|
| DOI | 10.2147/tcrm.s41022 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Xiu-Ping Zhu, Ling-Ling Zhu, Quan Zhou |
| Abstract |
A retrospective utilization study was performed to evaluate utilization patterns for enteral nutrition in a university teaching hospital. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 52 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 10 | 19% |
| Researcher | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 13% |
| Unknown | 14 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 23% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 17 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2013.
All research outputs
#22,759,452
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#1,204
of 1,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#259,371
of 291,207 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#9
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,323 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,207 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.