↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Comparison of Outcome and Quality of Life Between Thulium Laser (VelaTM XL) Enucleation of Prostate and Bipolar Transurethral Enucleation of the Prostate (B-TUEP)

Overview of attention for article published in Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, February 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
Comparison of Outcome and Quality of Life Between Thulium Laser (VelaTM XL) Enucleation of Prostate and Bipolar Transurethral Enucleation of the Prostate (B-TUEP)
Published in
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, February 2022
DOI 10.2147/tcrm.s352583
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yu-Ting Chen, Chen-Pang Hou, Horng-Heng Juang, Yu-Hsiang Lin, Pei-Shan Yang, Phei-Lang Chang, Chien-lun Chen, Shu-Chuan Weng, Ke-Hung Tsui

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 20%
Other 2 20%
Student > Master 1 10%
Unknown 5 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 20%
Computer Science 1 10%
Sports and Recreations 1 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 10%
Unknown 5 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2022.
All research outputs
#22,774,430
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#1,204
of 1,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#442,213
of 517,864 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#16
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,323 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 517,864 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.