| Title |
Comparison of the Effectiveness and Tolerability of Nabiximols (THC:CBD) Oromucosal Spray versus Oral Dronabinol (THC) as Add-on Treatment for Severe Neuropathic Pain in Real-World Clinical Practice: Retrospective Analysis of the German Pain e-Registry
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Pain Research, February 2022
|
| DOI | 10.2147/jpr.s340968 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael A Ueberall, Ute Essner, Carlos Vila Silván, Gerhard H H Mueller-Schwefe |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 37 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 14% |
| Professor | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 20 | 54% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 16% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 8% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 3% |
| Psychology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 14% |
| Unknown | 18 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2023.
All research outputs
#3,579,088
of 24,962,233 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pain Research
#403
of 1,937 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,469
of 514,816 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pain Research
#7
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,962,233 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,937 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 514,816 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.