↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Health and economic benefits of physical activity for patients with spinal cord injury

Overview of attention for article published in ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
130 Mendeley
Title
Health and economic benefits of physical activity for patients with spinal cord injury
Published in
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR, October 2016
DOI 10.2147/ceor.s115103
Pubmed ID
Authors

Larry E Miller, William G Herbert

Abstract

Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a traumatic, life-disrupting event with an annual incidence of 17,000 cases in the US. SCI is characterized by progressive physical deconditioning due to limited mobility and lack of modalities to allow safe physical activity that may partially offset these deleterious physical changes. Approximately, 50% of patients with SCI report no leisure-time physical activity and 15% report leisure-time physical activity below the threshold where meaningful health benefits could be realized. Collectively, about 363,000 patients with SCI, or 65% of the entire spinal cord injured population in the US, engages in insufficient physical activity and represents a target population that could derive considerable health benefits from even modest physical activity levels. Currently, the annual direct costs related to SCI exceed US$45 billion in the US. Rehabilitation protocols and technologies aimed to improve functional mobility have potential to significantly reduce the risk of medical complications and cost associated with SCI. Patients who commence routine physical activity in the first post-injury year and experience typical motor function improvements would realize US$290,000 to US$435,000 in lifetime cost savings, primarily due to fewer hospitalizations and less reliance on assistive care. New assistive technologies that allow patients with SCI to safely engage in routine physical activity are desperately needed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 130 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 16 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 12%
Student > Master 15 12%
Researcher 12 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 7%
Other 28 22%
Unknown 35 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 17%
Neuroscience 9 7%
Sports and Recreations 7 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Other 24 18%
Unknown 38 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2017.
All research outputs
#8,510,020
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR
#200
of 525 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,114
of 332,789 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR
#12
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 525 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,789 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.