↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Reliability and validity of the Italian version of the 14-item Resilience Scale

Overview of attention for article published in Psychology Research and Behavior Management, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
142 Mendeley
Title
Reliability and validity of the Italian version of the 14-item Resilience Scale
Published in
Psychology Research and Behavior Management, October 2016
DOI 10.2147/prbm.s115657
Pubmed ID
Authors

Camilla Callegari, Lorenza Bertù, Melissa Lucano, Marta Ielmini, Elena Braggio, Simone Vender

Abstract

In recent years resilience has gained clinical relevance in sociological, psychological, and medical disciplines, and a lot of scales measuring resilience have been developed and have been utilized in the western countries. The aim of the study was to assess the psychometric properties of the Italian version of the 14-item Resilience Scale (RS-14), by describing its validity and reliability. As agreed with the authors of the original English version of the RS-14, it was translated into Italian. Then the standard procedure for back-translation was followed. In total, 150 participants among the nursing and professional education students of the University of Insubria of Varese and health workers of the "ASST dei Sette Laghi-Ospedale di Circolo" of Varese were enrolled. The responses to the questionnaires were collected only from the students and the health workers between the ages of 18 and 65 years who gave their consent to participate in the study from April to September 2015. A subsample of 26 students and health workers was retested on the RS-14, 5 weeks after the first assessment. The questionnaires were handed out to 214 people, and 150 sets of questionnaires (70%) were returned, of which eight were subsequently removed because >60% of the answers were missing. In order to ensure anonymity, every completed questionnaire was identified only via a code. No significant differences were found between the mean values of the resilience scores between women (76.1) and men (76.3), with unpaired t-test = -0.08 and P=0.93. Similarly, no difference between resilience scores were found between mean age group of 18-25 years (75.3) and 26-65 years (78.7), with t-test = 1.6. The overall Cronbach's alpha of the RS-14 is 0.88, P=0.10. The RS-14 is negatively correlated with the Beck Depression Inventory-Primary Care Version and the 12-item General Health Questionnaire and positively correlated with the World Health Organization Quality of Life-Brief Version. The test-retest reliability, assessed on the 26 subjects 5 weeks after the first evaluation, highlighted an intraclass correlation coefficient value equal to 0.65. Factor analysis retains three factors, and it considers the factor loadings >0.40: RS-14-06 ('I am determined') is loaded on all the factors and RS-14-12 ('In an emergency, I am someone people can generally rely on') is not loaded on any factor. This study demonstrates that the Italian RS-14 has psychometric properties with a good level of internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.88), an adequate concurrent validity, verified by relationships with the other scales and as it was expected from literature, and an acceptable test-retest reliability.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 142 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 13%
Student > Bachelor 17 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 11%
Student > Master 13 9%
Student > Postgraduate 8 6%
Other 25 18%
Unknown 46 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 41 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 8%
Social Sciences 6 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Other 19 13%
Unknown 47 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2016.
All research outputs
#15,385,802
of 22,890,496 outputs
Outputs from Psychology Research and Behavior Management
#347
of 563 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#205,314
of 324,317 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychology Research and Behavior Management
#7
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,890,496 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 563 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,317 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.