| Title |
Clinical Features and CT Imaging Analysis of Hepatic Sinuscase-Syndrome and Budd–Chiari Syndrome
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of General Medicine, March 2022
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ijgm.s348176 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Feng Dai, Wei Qiao, Zheng Kang, Yan Chen, Kang Li, Wenrong Shen, Xiuming Zhang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2022.
All research outputs
#15,169,143
of 23,330,477 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of General Medicine
#582
of 1,491 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#235,564
of 442,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of General Medicine
#44
of 151 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,330,477 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,491 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,052 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 151 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.