↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Meta-analysis and review: effectiveness, safety, and central port design of the intraocular collamer lens

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Ophthalmology, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
222 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
130 Mendeley
Title
Meta-analysis and review: effectiveness, safety, and central port design of the intraocular collamer lens
Published in
Clinical Ophthalmology, June 2016
DOI 10.2147/opth.s111620
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mark Packer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 130 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 14 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 9%
Researcher 12 9%
Other 9 7%
Student > Master 9 7%
Other 29 22%
Unknown 45 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 56 43%
Engineering 3 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 56 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2022.
All research outputs
#17,700,438
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#1,818
of 3,777 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#227,636
of 357,374 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#48
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,777 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,374 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.