Title |
Identification of an eight-gene prognostic signature for lung adenocarcinoma
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cancer Management and Research, September 2018
|
DOI | 10.2147/cmar.s173941 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Shicheng Li, Yunpeng Xuan, Bing Gao, Xiao Sun, Shuncheng Miao, Tong Lu, Yuanyong Wang, Wenjie Jiao |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 7 | 41% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 18% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 6% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 6% |
Other | 1 | 6% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 4 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 18% |
Computer Science | 2 | 12% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 12% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 6% |
Neuroscience | 1 | 6% |
Other | 2 | 12% |
Unknown | 6 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2022.
All research outputs
#3,895,363
of 23,339,727 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Management and Research
#135
of 2,021 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,028
of 336,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Management and Research
#12
of 109 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,339,727 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,021 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,386 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 109 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.