↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Influence of inhaler technique on asthma and COPD control: a multicenter experience

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
20 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
166 Mendeley
Title
Influence of inhaler technique on asthma and COPD control: a multicenter experience
Published in
International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, October 2016
DOI 10.2147/copd.s114576
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aleksandra Dudvarski Ilic, Vladimir Zugic, Biljana Zvezdin, Ivan Kopitovic, Ivan Cekerevac, Vojislav Cupurdija, Nela Perhoc, Vesna Veljkovic, Aleksandra Barac

Abstract

The successful management of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) mostly depends on adherence to inhalation drug therapy, the usage of which is commonly associated with many difficulties in real life. Improvement of patients' adherence to inhalation technique could lead to a better outcome in the treatment of asthma and COPD. The aim of this study was to assess the utility of inhalation technique in clinical and functional control of asthma and COPD during a 3-month follow-up. A total of 312 patients with asthma or COPD who used dry powder Turbuhaler were enrolled in this observational study. During three visits (once a month), training in seven-step inhalation technique was given and it was practically demonstrated. Correctness of patients' usage of inhaler was assessed in three visits by scoring each of the seven steps during administration of inhaler dose. Assessment of disease control was done at each visit and evaluated as: fully controlled, partially controlled, or uncontrolled. Patients' subjective perception of the simplicity of inhalation technique, disease control, and quality of life were assessed by using specially designed questionnaires. Significant improvement in inhalation technique was achieved after the third visit compared to the first one, as measured by the seven-step inhaler usage score (5.94 and 6.82, respectively; P<0.001). Improvement of disease control significantly increased from visit 1 to visit 2 (53.9% and 74.5%, respectively; P<0.001) and from visit 2 to visit 3 (74.5% and 77%, respectively; P<0.001). Patients' subjective assessment of symptoms and quality of life significantly improved from visit 1 to visit 3 (P<0.001). Adherence to inhalation therapy is one of the key factors of successful respiratory disease treatment. Therefore, health care professionals should insist on educational programs aimed at improving patients' inhalation technique with different devices, resulting in better long-term disease control and improved quality of life.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 166 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 166 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 22 13%
Student > Master 20 12%
Student > Bachelor 19 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 10%
Researcher 10 6%
Other 29 17%
Unknown 49 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 52 31%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 22 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 13%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 1%
Other 8 5%
Unknown 58 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2016.
All research outputs
#2,835,253
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#305
of 2,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,241
of 332,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#13
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,577 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,555 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.