↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Leishmaniasis–HIV coinfection: current challenges

Overview of attention for article published in HIV/AIDS (Auckland, N.Z.), October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#33 of 330)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
96 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
245 Mendeley
Title
Leishmaniasis–HIV coinfection: current challenges
Published in
HIV/AIDS (Auckland, N.Z.), October 2016
DOI 10.2147/hiv.s93789
Pubmed ID
Authors

José Angelo Lauletta Lindoso, Mirella Alves Cunha, Igor Thiago Queiroz, Carlos Henrique Valente Moreira

Abstract

Leishmaniasis - human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) coinfection can manifest itself as tegumentary or visceral leishmaniasis. Almost 35 countries have reported autochthonous coinfections. Visceral leishmaniasis is more frequently described. However, usual and unusual manifestations of tegumentary leishmaniasis have been reported mainly in the Americas, but the real prevalence of Leishmania infection in HIV-infected patients is not clear. Regarding the clinical manifestations, there are some reports showing unusual manifestations in visceral leishmaniasis and tegumentary leishmaniasis in HIV-infected patients; yet, the usual manifestations are more frequent. Leishmaniasis diagnosis relies on clinical methods, but serological tests are used to diagnose visceral leishmaniasis despite them having a low sensitivity to tegumentary leishmaniasis. The search for the parasite is used to diagnose both visceral leishmaniasis and tegumentary leishmaniasis. Nevertheless, in HIV-infected patients, the sensitivity of serology is very low. Drugs available to treat leishmaniasis are more restricted and cause severe side effects. Furthermore, in HIV-infected patients, these side effects are more prominent and relapses and lethality are more recurrent. In this article, we discuss the current challenges of tegumentary leishmaniasis and visceral leishmaniasis-HIV infection, focusing mainly on the clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and treatment of leishmaniasis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 245 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 245 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 40 16%
Student > Bachelor 40 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 16%
Researcher 18 7%
Student > Postgraduate 14 6%
Other 31 13%
Unknown 63 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 41 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 38 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 21 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 13 5%
Other 35 14%
Unknown 76 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2024.
All research outputs
#4,192,244
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from HIV/AIDS (Auckland, N.Z.)
#33
of 330 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,690
of 332,576 outputs
Outputs of similar age from HIV/AIDS (Auckland, N.Z.)
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 330 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,576 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them