↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Assessment of quality of life in patients with visual impairments using a new visual function questionnaire: the VFQ-J11

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Ophthalmology, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
Title
Assessment of quality of life in patients with visual impairments using a new visual function questionnaire: the VFQ-J11
Published in
Clinical Ophthalmology, October 2016
DOI 10.2147/opth.s115159
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tadashi Nakano, Motoko Kawashima, Yoshimune Hiratsuka, Hiroshi Tamura, Koichi Ono, Akira Murakami, Kazuo Tsubota, Masakazu Yamada

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to assess the vision-related quality of life (QOL) of visually impaired patients using the Japanese 11-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (VFQ-J11). Comparisons with the 25-item version (VFQ-25) and the EuroQoL Index using a large group of patients with various degrees of impairments and various causative diseases were performed. A total of 232 visually impaired Japanese patients were recruited from six ophthalmology departments in Japan. Information on ophthalmic findings and patient backgrounds was collected, and information on QOL and utility assessments was collected from the patients by means of survey questionnaires. The average age of patients was 69.6±14.3 years. Both the vision-related QOL scores (VFQ-25 composite and VFQ-J11) were significantly associated with better and worse visual acuity (VA) in visually impaired subjects (all P<0.01). VFQ-J11 was comparable to VFQ-25 regardless of causative diseases. VFQ-25 composite and the VFQ-J11 scores were concurrently associated with a range of systemic medical disorders. EuroQoL Index had a significant association with better eye VA (P<0.01), but not with worse eye VA, or any systemic disorders. VFQ-J11 provides valid data on vision-related QOL and is less of a burden for patients with vision problems.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 47 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 17%
Other 4 9%
Researcher 4 9%
Professor 3 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 6%
Other 8 17%
Unknown 17 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 13%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 6%
Psychology 1 2%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 23 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2018.
All research outputs
#7,960,693
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#708
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,961
of 332,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#15
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,577 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.