| Title |
Comparing bevacizumab and ranibizumab for initial reduction of central macular thickness in patients with retinal vein occlusions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Ophthalmology, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.2147/opth.s46235 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael A Singer, Steven R Cohen, Sylvia L Groth, Salman Porbandarwalla |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 5% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 19 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 6 | 29% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 14% |
| Professor | 3 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 14% |
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Other | 3 | 14% |
| Unknown | 1 | 5% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 33% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 24% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 10% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 10% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 2 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2017.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#820
of 3,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,623
of 206,704 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#20
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,712 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,704 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.