Title |
Effects of a nutraceutical formulation based on the combination of antioxidants and ω-3 essential fatty acids in the expression of inflammation and immune response mediators in tears from patients with dry eye disorders
|
---|---|
Published in |
Clinical Interventions in Aging, February 2013
|
DOI | 10.2147/cia.s40640 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Maria D Pinazo-Durán, Carmen Galbis-Estrada, Sheila Pons-Vázquez, Jorge Cantú-Dibildox, Carla Marco-Ramírez, Javier Benítez-del-Castillo |
Abstract |
Women, and those older than 65 years of age, are particularly susceptible to dry eye disorders (DEDs). Inflammation is clearly involved in the pathogenesis of DEDs, and there is mounting evidence on the antioxidant and antiinflammatory properties of essential polyunsaturated fatty acids (EPUFAs). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 2 | 2% |
Unknown | 96 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 20 | 20% |
Student > Bachelor | 12 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 9% |
Student > Master | 8 | 8% |
Other | 11 | 11% |
Unknown | 28 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 34% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 13% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 6% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 2% |
Other | 10 | 10% |
Unknown | 30 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2013.
All research outputs
#19,945,185
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#1,407
of 1,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#221,872
of 291,228 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#26
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,968 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,228 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.