↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Association of preoperative levels of selected blood inflammatory markers with prognosis in gliomas

Overview of attention for article published in OncoTargets and therapy, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
Title
Association of preoperative levels of selected blood inflammatory markers with prognosis in gliomas
Published in
OncoTargets and therapy, October 2016
DOI 10.2147/ott.s113606
Pubmed ID
Authors

Raushan Auezova, Nurzhan Ryskeldiev, Aidos Doskaliyev, Yerbol Kuanyshev, Berik Zhetpisbaev, Nurgul Aldiyarova, Natalia Ivanova, Serik Akshulakov, Lizette Auezova

Abstract

Red cell distribution width (RDW), neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and platelet count (PLT) routinely tested as part of the complete blood count are indicative of systemic inflammation. The prognostic significance of NLR and PLT in cancer was demonstrated in many studies while the role of RDW has been hardly investigated. The present study aimed to assess the association of RDW, NLR, and PLT with survival and tumor grade in glioma patients. Clinical data from 178 patients with primary gliomas treated in a single institution were retrospectively analyzed. Receiver operating characteristic curves for cutoff value determination, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, various bivariate tests, and univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed. Patients with high RDW (≥13.95) and NLR (≥4) levels had worse overall survival (OS) (Wilcoxon test, P<0.026 and P<0.003, respectively) while the effect of thrombocytosis (≥400×10(9)/L) on prognosis was not significant. Besides, a strong association between RDW and NLR was found (Spearman's rho =0.230, P<0.02; χ(2)=8.887, P<0.03; Mann-Whitney U-test, P<0.017). Moreover, RDW and NLR were significantly associated with tumor grade. In univariate Cox analysis, elevated NLR (hazard ratio, HR 1.385; confidence interval, CI 1.020-1.881, P<0.037), older age (HR 0.452, CI 0.329-0.621, P<0), and higher tumor grade (HR 1.624, CI 1.187-2.223, P<0.002) were associated with poor outcomes. In the multivariate analysis, tumor grade, age, and Karnofsky performance score were identified as being independently prognostic for OS. Preoperative NLR and RDW values can help to evaluate disease progression and outcomes in patients with gliomas, thereby contributing to patient follow-up optimization.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 21%
Student > Master 5 12%
Student > Postgraduate 3 7%
Researcher 3 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 7%
Other 7 17%
Unknown 12 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 52%
Neuroscience 2 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Unspecified 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 14 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2016.
All research outputs
#17,351,840
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from OncoTargets and therapy
#1,152
of 3,021 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#216,813
of 332,796 outputs
Outputs of similar age from OncoTargets and therapy
#39
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,021 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,796 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.