↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Importance of Reporting Complete Procedures of Identifying Patients from the Danish National Patient Registry: The Case of Neonatal Jaundice and Epilepsy

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Epidemiology, April 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
Importance of Reporting Complete Procedures of Identifying Patients from the Danish National Patient Registry: The Case of Neonatal Jaundice and Epilepsy
Published in
Clinical Epidemiology, April 2022
DOI 10.2147/clep.s353215
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yuelian Sun, Julie Werenberg Dreier, Chunsen Wu, Vera Ehrenstein, Jakob Christensen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 33%
Unknown 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 33%
Unknown 1 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2022.
All research outputs
#13,792,852
of 23,500,709 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Epidemiology
#379
of 741 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#190,481
of 443,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Epidemiology
#12
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,500,709 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 741 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,806 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.