| Title |
Potential protective effects of rhEGF against ultraviolet A irradiation-induced damages on human fibroblasts
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ccid.s170697 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ji Min Kim, Jung Eun Choo, Ki Nam Kim, Yang Seok Kim |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 13% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 13% |
| Other | 1 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2019.
All research outputs
#8,538,940
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology
#387
of 905 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#141,909
of 354,551 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology
#10
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 905 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,551 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.