↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

A comparison of diagnostic panels in the immunohistochemical analysis of lung cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Pathology and laboratory medicine international PLMI, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
A comparison of diagnostic panels in the immunohistochemical analysis of lung cancer
Published in
Pathology and laboratory medicine international PLMI, September 2019
DOI 10.2147/plmi.s204421
Authors

Sarita Prabhakaran, Guang Xing, Ashleigh Hocking, Matthew Hussey, Douglas W. Henderson, Sonja Klebe

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 2 50%
Student > Postgraduate 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2019.
All research outputs
#22,771,990
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Pathology and laboratory medicine international PLMI
#31
of 33 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#300,954
of 350,007 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pathology and laboratory medicine international PLMI
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one scored the same or higher as 2 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,007 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them