↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Management of patients with calciphylaxis: current perspectives

Overview of attention for article published in Chronic Wound Care Management and Research, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Management of patients with calciphylaxis: current perspectives
Published in
Chronic Wound Care Management and Research, October 2019
DOI 10.2147/cwcmr.s182417
Authors

Cornelia Erfurt-Berge, Regina Renner

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 20%
Student > Bachelor 1 20%
Researcher 1 20%
Unknown 2 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 1 20%
Psychology 1 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 20%
Unknown 2 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2019.
All research outputs
#20,712,517
of 23,312,088 outputs
Outputs from Chronic Wound Care Management and Research
#49
of 51 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#298,223
of 350,485 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chronic Wound Care Management and Research
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,312,088 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 51 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,485 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.