↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Hard water softening effect of a baby cleanser

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
Hard water softening effect of a baby cleanser
Published in
Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology, October 2016
DOI 10.2147/ccid.s111729
Pubmed ID
Authors

Russel M Walters, Emmanuel Anim-Danso, Stephanie M Amato, Kimberly A Capone, M Catherine Mack, Lorena S Telofski, David A Mays

Abstract

Hard water is associated with atopic dermatitis (eczema). We wanted to determine if a baby cleanser and its individual components altered free ionized calcium (Ca(2+)) in a simulated hard water baby bath. For these studies, an in vitro determination of free Ca(2+) in a simulated hard water baby bath, and an in vivo exploratory study of free Ca(2+) absorption into skin from hard water were performed. Free Ca(2+) was measured with an ion-sensitive electrode in vitro in hard water (100-500 ppm, Ca(2+)) before and after addition of the cleanser and/or its components. In an exploratory study, absorption of Ca(2+) into skin from hard water was determined in three female participants (aged 21-29 years). At an in-use dilution of 1%, the test cleanser reduced free Ca(2+) from ~500 ppm to <200 ppm; a 10% in-use dilution bound virtually all free Ca(2+). The anionic surfactant component contributed the most to this effect. In the exploratory in vivo study, we measured a reduction of ~15% in free Ca(2+) from simulated hard water over 10 minutes. Baby cleansers can bind free Ca(2+) and reduce the effective water hardness of bath water. Reducing the amount of free Ca(2+) in the water will reduce the availability of the ion for binding to the skin. Altering or reducing free Ca(2+) concentrations in bath water may be an important parameter in creating the ideal baby bath.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 22%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Student > Master 2 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Unspecified 1 6%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 6 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 28%
Materials Science 2 11%
Unspecified 1 6%
Decision Sciences 1 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 6%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 6 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2016.
All research outputs
#17,285,036
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology
#558
of 905 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#216,521
of 332,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology
#18
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 905 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.2. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,555 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.