↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Non-surgical management of a pediatric “intoed” gait pattern – a systematic review of the current best evidence

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
109 Mendeley
Title
Non-surgical management of a pediatric “intoed” gait pattern – a systematic review of the current best evidence
Published in
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, January 2012
DOI 10.2147/jmdh.s28669
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hayley Uden, Saravana Kumar

Abstract

An intoed gait pattern is one of the most common referrals for children to an orthopedic consultation. Parental concern as to the aesthetics of the child's gait pattern and/or its symptomatic nature will primarily drive these referrals during a child's early developmental years. Whilst some of these referrals prove to be the result of a normal growth variant, some children will present with a symptomatic intoed gait pattern. Various treatments, both conservative and surgical, have been proposed including: braces, wedges, stretches and exercises, shoe modifications, and surgical procedures. However, which treatments are effective and justified in the management of this condition is not clear within the literature. The aim of this systematic review was to therefore identify and critique the best available evidence for the non-surgical management of an intoed gait pattern in a pediatric population.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 109 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 25 23%
Student > Postgraduate 13 12%
Student > Master 12 11%
Other 7 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 22 20%
Unknown 23 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 32 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 29 27%
Engineering 6 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Other 9 8%
Unknown 27 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2018.
All research outputs
#2,558,246
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
#92
of 991 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,437
of 250,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 991 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,933 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them