↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Differential expression of two activating transcription factor 5 isoforms in papillary thyroid carcinoma

Overview of attention for article published in OncoTargets and therapy, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
Differential expression of two activating transcription factor 5 isoforms in papillary thyroid carcinoma
Published in
OncoTargets and therapy, October 2016
DOI 10.2147/ott.s113194
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luisa Vicari, Cristina La Rosa, Stefano Forte, Giovanna Calabrese, Cristina Colarossi, Eleonora Aiello, Salvatore Salluzzo, Lorenzo Memeo

Abstract

Activating transcription factor 5 (ATF5) is a member of the activating transcription/cAMP response element-binding protein family of basic leucine zipper proteins that plays an important role in cell survival, differentiation, proliferation, and apoptosis. The ATF5 gene generates two transcripts: ATF5 isoform 1 and ATF5 isoform 2. A number of studies indicate that ATF5 could be an attractive target for therapeutic intervention in several tumor types; however, so far, the role of ATF5 has not been investigated in papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). Quantitative real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction and immuno-histochemical staining were used to study ATF5 mRNA and protein expression in PTC. We report here that ATF5 is expressed more in PTC tissue than in normal thyroid tissue. Furthermore, this is the first study that describes the presence of both ATF5 isoforms in PTC. These findings could provide potential applications in PTC cancer treatment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 25%
Student > Bachelor 1 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 13%
Professor 1 13%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 13%
Unknown 2 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2016.
All research outputs
#16,881,298
of 25,604,262 outputs
Outputs from OncoTargets and therapy
#993
of 3,012 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#207,992
of 333,214 outputs
Outputs of similar age from OncoTargets and therapy
#33
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,604,262 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,012 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,214 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.