↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Comparison Between PE-TLIF and MIS-TLIF in the Treatment of Middle-Aged and Elderly Patients with Single-Level Lumbar Disc Herniation

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Pain Research, April 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
Comparison Between PE-TLIF and MIS-TLIF in the Treatment of Middle-Aged and Elderly Patients with Single-Level Lumbar Disc Herniation
Published in
Journal of Pain Research, April 2022
DOI 10.2147/jpr.s371635
Pubmed ID
Authors

Qi Han, Feifan Meng, Ming Chen, Xiangjun Lu, Deyuan Zhao, Dongze Wu, Tingting Wang, Rujie Qin

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 11%
Student > Bachelor 1 11%
Student > Master 1 11%
Unknown 6 67%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 11%
Unknown 6 67%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2022.
All research outputs
#21,017,279
of 23,652,325 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pain Research
#1,644
of 1,817 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#362,482
of 444,300 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pain Research
#43
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,652,325 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,817 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,300 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.