↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Patients opting for breast reconstruction following mastectomy: an analysis of uptake rates and benefit

Overview of attention for article published in Breast cancer targets and therapy, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#14 of 322)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
Title
Patients opting for breast reconstruction following mastectomy: an analysis of uptake rates and benefit
Published in
Breast cancer targets and therapy, February 2013
DOI 10.2147/bctt.s29142
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marissa M Howard-McNatt

Abstract

For women with breast cancer who undergo a mastectomy, breast reconstruction offers improved psychological and cosmetic outcomes. We analyzed the rates of breast reconstruction and potential benefits to these women. The review was based on a PubMed search using the terms "reconstruction," "mastectomy," "rates," "benefits," and "breast cancer." Breast-reconstruction rates have continued to rise in recent years; however, there are definite barriers to widespread use of this procedure. These barriers include age, ethnicity, income, tumor characteristics, and the need for adjuvant radiation therapy. There are notable psychological advantages to women who receive breast reconstruction. These women also express an improved quality of life. Breast reconstruction is an acceptable technique for women undergoing mastectomy. It should be offered to all women in an immediate or delayed fashion, with guidance from their physician about the benefits and risks.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 1%
Unknown 84 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 18 21%
Student > Master 18 21%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 6%
Other 4 5%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 24 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 42%
Engineering 7 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 7%
Psychology 4 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 24 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2021.
All research outputs
#1,732,825
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Breast cancer targets and therapy
#14
of 322 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,994
of 292,111 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Breast cancer targets and therapy
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 322 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,111 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them