| Title |
Dual-channel functional electrical stimulation improvements in speed-based gait classifications
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Interventions in Aging, February 2013
|
| DOI | 10.2147/cia.s41141 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shmuel Springer, Yocheved Laufer, Meni Becher, Jean-Jacques Vatine |
| Abstract |
Functional electrical stimulation (FES) is becoming an accepted treatment method for enhancing gait performance in patients who present with gait difficulties resulting from hemiparesis. The purpose of this study was to test whether individuals with hemiparesis who have varied gait speeds, which place them in different functional categories, benefit to the same extent from the application of FES. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 66 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 11 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 10% |
| Researcher | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Unknown | 20 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 24% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 15% |
| Engineering | 9 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 23 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2023.
All research outputs
#8,039,503
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#753
of 1,962 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,118
of 292,111 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#15
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,962 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,111 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.