↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Predictors of Prolonged Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy and the Creation of a Scoring System for the Duration

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Management and Research, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Predictors of Prolonged Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy and the Creation of a Scoring System for the Duration
Published in
Cancer Management and Research, September 2020
DOI 10.2147/cmar.s265480
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shao-Hao Chen, Zhi-Bin Ke, Yu-Peng Wu, Dong-Ning Chen, Xiang Yu, Yu Chen, Yong Wei, Qing-Shui Zheng, Xue-Yi Xue, Ning Xu

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 2 40%
Researcher 1 20%
Unknown 2 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Linguistics 1 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 20%
Unknown 2 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2022.
All research outputs
#7,753,975
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Management and Research
#352
of 2,032 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,949
of 400,892 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Management and Research
#10
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,032 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,892 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.