↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Clinical Risk Factors for Thoracic Ossification of the Ligamentum Flavum: A Cross-Sectional Study Based on Spinal Thoracic Three-Dimensional Computerized Tomography

Overview of attention for article published in Risk Management and Healthcare Policy, May 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Clinical Risk Factors for Thoracic Ossification of the Ligamentum Flavum: A Cross-Sectional Study Based on Spinal Thoracic Three-Dimensional Computerized Tomography
Published in
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy, May 2022
DOI 10.2147/rmhp.s361730
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hao Zhang, Nian Deng, Lu Zhang, Lei Zhang, Chao Wang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2022.
All research outputs
#21,106,279
of 23,755,107 outputs
Outputs from Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
#580
of 662 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#361,574
of 444,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
#27
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,755,107 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 662 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,472 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.