↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Patient Selection for Renal Denervation in Hypertensive Patients: What Makes a Good Candidate?

Overview of attention for article published in Vascular Health and Risk Management, May 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
Patient Selection for Renal Denervation in Hypertensive Patients: What Makes a Good Candidate?
Published in
Vascular Health and Risk Management, May 2022
DOI 10.2147/vhrm.s270182
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sheran Li, Jacqueline K Phillips

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 5 29%
Researcher 2 12%
Student > Master 2 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 5 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 5 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 6%
Unknown 6 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2022.
All research outputs
#19,961,193
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Vascular Health and Risk Management
#650
of 804 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#316,968
of 445,946 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Vascular Health and Risk Management
#11
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 804 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,946 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.